New Flags

White Diasporiation, Re-establishing the East India Company, and why Mass Deportations won't fix your life.

An outpost of civilisation: visions of a possible future

N.b. With this article, as increasingly, with all my pieces, I’ve finished it to an acceptable quality while still not quite being happy with it. Read at your own risk.

---

Diaspora: “Any group of people who have spread or become dispersed beyond their traditional homeland or point of origin; the dispersion or spread of a group of people in this way; an instance of this.”

Also,

“A population dispersed from its geographic homeland to multiple regions across the globe”

In my previous article, Are we White or are we People?, I discussed questions of racial identity and nationhood, along with expressing my own desire to found [a] nation[s]. Since writing that piece, I’ve had the chance to encounter various pieces, thoughts, memories, which have spurred this thinking on, especially in regards to the future of Western nations, or, as I will refer to them Legacy nations, that is, major Western countries which hold influence on the world stage and have existed within, or at least near to, their current borders for some time, the loss of respective empires notwithstanding.

When the right discusses the future of the West, of, as it were, White nations, there is, I find, and have lamented before, an inability to consider a world where we don’t “win”, where there is no explosive fascist revolution and deportation of all non-Whites, erasure of the effects mass migration has had, and so on. I would like to re-iterate that I do not mean by this that we necessarily “lose”, rather to rethink what exactly “winning” means, and if it’s enough for you, as, even were we to win, there would yet be issues to overcome, deep-seated societal issues of hundreds of years of development which may yet be the true barriers in the way of our return to the golden path.

There are several problems to contend with which the online right, the mainstream right, rarely address or even consider. To begin with, as I have written before, Western nations have vast economic issues which future governments will continue to fail to solve for some time yet. Yes, mass deportations would improve certain matters, availability of housing, of work, but not fully solve them. Furthermore, one must bear in mind that the vast majority of the public - including the so-called right-wing - Do not have the stomach for actual mass removals, especially of supposed citizens, and the logistics of them would be very difficult should the government in charge at the time be unwilling to carry them out with sufficient brutality not only against those they are removing, but the countries they are imposing these deportees on, and those of their own population who are protesting. Though I myself long for the catharsis of such acts, far easier are social and economic incentives for self deportations than to shoot protesters in the face. But I am not a logistician.

Far more likely in the long run is cultural deportation, the removal of foreign subcultures from our nations, banning of Kosher, of Halal, of Burqas and Niqabs and ghettos, encouraging self-deportation while maintaining significant “integrated” foreign populations. In truth, most populations care little more of their country than for the home they sleep in and the bread they eat, and even very few of our own self-professed nationalists maintain our “culture”. However, people in Western nations do want to maintain a certain standard of way of life, a standard into which certain foreigners cannot integrate by nature, requiring a palatable and effective solution, pantsuit nationalism applied, Right-Wing social effects without the unpleasant appearance of them. The first government to solve this issue will govern for a long, long time, and will effectively take the wind out of the so-called far-right’s sails. The nations where this happens will effectively become mildly-culturally linked economic zones, the priorities of which will be strong police presence, heavy corporatism, solving cultural and economic issues, at the cost of native identity. This is where Singapore is, where the US, UK are vying toward, what Sweden is struggling not to become, though, having been there recently it does feel like it’s already there, with their often-foreign-yet-dependable Ordningsvakt militia forces.

The aforementioned state is what, for many, winning will look like. A safer country, a fairly stable foreign ethnic presence, aw finally enforced, cultures that conflict with modern values of gay and women’s lib supressed. Hypersexualised, Hypercapitalist, culturally stagnant, manufactured, with links to the past largely erased, this was first attempted in earnest in the UK with the “British Values” campaign by the conservative party, has been what the Labour government has tried to maintain, and likely what the UK will get when Reform UK win the next election. Civic nationalism, perfected.

This is one of two futures I see for Western nations. I call this model “Brazil”, a little cynically, I admit, because Brazil is not something we should wish to emulate, a mishmash state with little that ties it’s various subspecies together these days bar football and Capoeira, along with BOPE conducting occasional drone strikes on cartel members. Instead of that, the UK, US, will get PinkPantheress and Sabrina Carpenter, ultra-integrated citizens of migrant descent conducting deportation ops against their fellow man, as we can already see in the US via Asian, Hispanic ICE agents, or the many non-Whites on the British mainstream RW. Even Labour, the left-wing ruling party of Britain are currently crowing about bringing “net migration” down by 82%. Of course, this reduction is largely illusory, but the point stands.

Brazilification is when your country reaches a point of almost irrecoverable cultural, ethnic collapse and then every subsequent government attempts to paper over the cracks with increasingly heavy-handed methods, all the while real change is impossible because you have a firmly integrated minority population(s) the vast majority don’t actually want to get rid of or can’t vote to remove even if they want to. It’s not the end of the world, but it’s also not ideal, and produces nations where the biggest risk to Whites is demographic decline, largely via mass abortions of White children. In some ways the YooKay is there already, in other ways France was there years ago, but we’re all still pretending we aren’t, which gives us a chance to still break away, while, I’m afraid, the USA, with it’s 56% White population, is unlikely to escape. The best Statesiders can hope for is to maintain a WASP ruling class and aggressively impose their culture on the Nation, which, admittedly, MAGA is trying to do.

Behold, the future

Effectively this model is Civic nationalism, but applied, not so far from Yarvin and Land’s accelerated Palantir state. I’m not a fan of this, honestly, but it’s what America already is, has been for decades, what the YooKay, swathes of the EU will likely become.

The other model, the other future, is perhaps better. I call it El Salvador, and it involves brutal prevention of immigration, at the border, brutal crackdown on crime, mass imprisonment of criminals and aggressive maintenance of culture, before large-scale demographic and or cultural changes have taken hold. Some countries are somewhat aiming towards this, Poland is one, though the changes required to get to this stage require to effectively have a supermajority in government or a dictatorship. I think this is how people on the RW mostly want their countries to be, though, if you country is not already behaving like this, I find it hard to imagine how it will get there, due to the aforementioned issues of the Brazil Model. I don’t know how good this is because I’ve never experienced it, and it must be said that what works in El Salvador may not work anywhere else, but it’s undeniable that it seems to bring the murder rate down.

I must now however interject: Is this winning for you? Is this enough? I know, I know, I am bold to assert that, even were we to have mass deportations, it would not be enough for me. And yet, I want an adventurous life, a living country, not just a safe house and cheap electricity, as, I think, do you. For now. let us return to the issues of where our countries are going, the problems they face.

As mentioned before, there are multiple problems. Firstly, we are at a stage now where, in developed nations, supposed “Artificial Intelligence” and robotics are going to start seriously cutting into already-thin employments markets, markets too thin to be saved by mass deportations. Britain, for example, is in need of around ten million jobs which do not exist. We are reaching 5% youth unemployment. Across the board, it’s actually even worse in other nations. Australia suffers 11% [youth unemployment], Canada 13.8%, America 10.5%, France 20.5%, Germany 7.5%, and the aforementioned Poland, who are keeping a handle on immigration far more than these other countries, is still at 12.4%. Far-Right, long-praised Hungary is at 12-14%, Spain sits at a staggering 23.5%, and the EU average is 15%. This is not sustainable, and clearly cannot be accounted for purely by immigration, much as it is worsening these problems. All this brings us onto a major problem, namely, the issue of the treatment of youth in legacy nations.

Employment matters, housing crises, mass surveillance notwithstanding, the West suffers, has suffered for decades, an insane social culture which despises, demonises male sexuality and autonomy, is hard to eradicate, since many men have internalised it themselves. I know this is hard to say, hard to swallow, but many of the worst offenders of the anti-THUMOS system in which we live are our own people! Young women who are heavily propagandised, other men, entire systems. Were every gimmigrant to be thrown into a blender tomorrow, we would still be left with the longhouse-adjacent society we live in, a gynocentric gerontocracy where a man’s “duty” is to work himself to the bone so the elderly who destroyed his country may life their twilight years in luxury, so that women may have all provided for them by a state which takes the role of father, husband, and abortionist all in one, a world that criminalises men for wanting a young and attractive girlfriend, that looksmatches thirty-year-old skinnyfat 3/10 Silicon valley Han Chinese girls with 8/10 Aryan men and has the gall to expect them to be grateful for it, where the stupidest and ugliest are elevated and the strong, the brave, the young and beautiful chastised. This will not be fixed by mass deportations! In fact, many who profess to be on our side are, consciously or not, in support of the aforementioned way of life that hates young men. Many older “RW” men absolutely hate young men, with every fibre of their being, much as they pretend not to.

Life, for the young man, is a never-ending humiliation ritual without seeming respite, and one he is expected to be grateful for and work to maintain. Increasingly, he resists. So, what happens now? Well, I have mentioned what will happen to legacy nations, things which, while fixing certain matters, will not solve our spiritual, cultural malaises. However, another way always manifests.

The truth today is that many, many young people are not very tied to their nations of birth, certainly not as much as Twatter nationalists would like them to be, unless you are, of course, a right-wing extremist, in which case you probably feel despair more than anything most days. What most all people prioritise, have always prioritised, is a comfortable life, what young men prioritise, or should prioritise, is excitement, wherever they may find it, things sorely lacking in the states of our current nations. As I have mentioned before, in my book, in previous articles, these desires can be seen via the existence of danger tourists, but also via those who volunteer for Ukraine, those who play video games even, those who just work out.

I do not think it is a sin for young men to want to see the world, experience it, experience adventure, fortune, glory, life itself, much as the desire to see the world for yourself seems to be treated as such by many today, including on our own side. Not everything, every moment of existence in this downward-pointed earth must be put through the lens of idealist politics.

For some decades now, the main belief regarding immigration has been that it is something brown people do to White countries as they come to take our welfare and rape our children in most cases, more rarely to become the CEO of Google or Prime Minister or something. White people don’t emigrate, immigrate, unless you’re a Euro or American moving to another country, for work or marriage, and then you’re called an Expat, so rare is this an occurrence. And yet, quietly, the number of émigrés has been increasing for some years, so that now around 100,000 Britons leave every year, never to return, allegedly. Net Emigration has been increasing year on year, though some of this can no doubt be explained by migrants leaving again. This isn’t hugely surprising, and for a long time, Brits fled to Australia, especially when it was, though it may be hard to believe, the world’s fastest-growing economy.

Now, the Aussies face a worse housing crisis than most of Europe combined, especially with a wave of South Asian immigration. I personally know Brits who have left for Australia, only to come back due to a lack of opportunities. Polls in the United States show 41% of Young adults are considering a permanent move abroad, though I believe those numbers are skewed by people who suffer Trump Derangement Syndrome lying. The reality is that around 300,000 people left last year, while not an enormous number, one which contributes to my thesis. You see, large numbers of Whites have never left their county, however, some, those in need of adventure or fortune have done historically, and it is young people best positioned to do this. The Empires are gone. Australia’s economy is no more. The EU is largely the same, no matter where you go. And yet, there are always new frontiers.

It is my belief that in the coming decades we will see increasing young White emigration to foreign, sometimes developing nations, though it will largely manifest as movement between European nations. This will likely not be enormous in scale, as Whites have only rarely migrated in huge numbers, and the character of this migration will lend itself largely to young people, and yet it will be steady, enough to have an effect, in the Americas I suspect into nations like El Salvador, perhaps Chile, in the West increasingly into Eastern and Balkan Europe, Asia, perhaps even parts of Africa, though less likely. It may even manifest itself simply by young people moving to specific cities.

It’s really only the logical conclusion that as young men and women experience a worsening social contract in the West, they will look to other nations to live, work. In fact, some countries are actively trying to encourage this with better tax regimes for young professionals, remote workers, Bulgaria, Montenegro, North Macedonia, even Greece, as it slowly recovers from its economic annihilation. As technology improves, the use of it becoming easier and more equalised globally, formerly developing and third world nations will rapidly improve, want foreign workers to kick-start their economy. Suriname, for example, is poised for an explosion due to its oil fields being exploited, by Western companies. African states will require their mineral and precious metal deposits to be exploited, South Sudan, Guinea, Uganda, Rwanda.

Please, do not think I am saying these are desirable, safe nations, and, again, I think most youth movement will be within Europe. I am merely saying that, as parts of the world develop, others stagnate, young men, nowadays some women, will always want new fields of opportunity, especially in an increasingly multipolar world where we are being forcibly deracinated. Look at what happened to the Rhodesians, the Empire tried to force them to yield, but they wanted to preserve who they were, did so in a foreign land in which they were a minority. Some Boers yet hold out in South Africa. Are we so different, now? In the war against global Zimbabwe, we are all Rhodesians.

If groups of young Whites move to nations with better opportunities, effectively insert themselves at a high level into foreign nations, form networks, what do we call that? We will see increasing White diasporas forming. As I have also mentioned before, people, groups, Erik Prince, Palantir, believe in colonialism. I’m not so sure about that. Colonialism suggests exploitation, and, while certain companies are absolutely following this model, it would be perhaps inaccurate to describe it as such if a community of Whites forms in a foreign country without assistance from their native government, or without the aim of seizing control, not that I would ever discourage this.

Is this White flight? I don’t think so. I don’t think White nations will stop existing, they will however become, stay weaker, less interesting, likely maintain a fairly stable non-White population. Things won’t change as much as people hope, even if they do get better, and here I ask again, is that enough for you? Do you want things to just be a bit better, less brown people in the longhouse, or do you want to live?

Men of the East India Company fight and die in a new world

To briefly allow myself to sink into theory, possibility, as I so often like to, in my previous article, I mentioned you can simply create new countries, gave some examples. I think that the easiest way to effectively achieve this will be corporatism. If you start a company in a foreign country, you can quite easily start what is effectively neo-colonialism, purchasing land for the company, employing workers, people you know from your own country. This is how the East India Company began, and with many countries keen for foreign investment, I don’t think it’s hyperbole to imagine such a thing occurring again. A large chunk of the Southeast Asian Golden Triangle, the “Golden Triangle Special Economic Zone” is effectively run this way, by one man, who was given a 100-year lease to create what is literally a Chinese colony. Is it used largely to ferry drugs out of the region? Yes, but no matter. It supports my point. Although the city of Male, Capital of the Maldives, is technically the capital of a larger nation, it is effectively a city-Microstate sitting on an island only 8.3KM Sq. Imagine what you could do on a larger island. Just because it hasn’t been done in a while doesn’t make it impossible. Orania exists today, after all.

I have of course often mentioned existing European Overseas territories, and I think it would be possible to further neocolonialise these, have larger groups of Europeans move to some of these with the view of creating functional societies anew, ones not so sick to the core as ours. Ah, if only we hadn’t leased Hong Kong, but held it as a permanent territory! Overseas territories can be the greatest preservers of White culture, and now we need them more than ever.

I must clarify, before I draw the ire of the many neurotics on our side of politics. I do not advocate for Whites leaving their homelands en masse, and, indeed, it will not happen, is silly to suggest. What I am saying, predicting, is in fact no more than a return to what has occurred in the past, effectively piratical, adventurous-minded Whites heading out to new frontiers for fortune and glory, taking all they are with them. Furthermore, my hope, on an existential level, is that, while foreigners come to our shores and set up parallel societies, we might do the same, set up global outposts to secure our identity and culture, preserve it overseas as so many great projects, Rhodesia, South Africa, attempted in the past! The world never turns out as we expect it, I would wish to immunise us, even should we “win” our current struggle. I look as ever to the future, past our current issues, the answers for which I do not have. I would hope my ideas are never necessary, and yet someone must consider other scenarios than just “winning” overnight.

I think it is also a good idea to put some pressure on the governments of our nations today. They need to see that it is not enough to merely fix the problems they have created. The social contract needs to be rewritten, to actually benefit men in a way it has done decreasingly since the end of the Second World War. Remember, it is young men who build, maintain nations, and our current systems are maintained by young people working to keep everything running. Fake HR jobs cannot replace us, and, society is already suffering for what it has done, though, hilariously, the onus is, as ever, placed on the shoulders of young men for what is being done unto them.

Consider the Jews. They have been expelled again and again, mostly justifiedly, and yet they persistently survive, amass power, influence. We are not at the same stage of desperate survival as them, I do not advocate for their parasitic behaviour, and yet, to pretend there is nothing to learn from them is absurd. I saw that there are wealthy Jews buying up islands in Greece, land in Argentina, to create effective backstops, should the Israeli project fail. We would be wise to consider such ideas.

I want two things for my people, I want us to survive, more than anything, and I want us to thrive. I cannot stand to watch us vie toward single victories only to think they will solve everything. I want to live to see young men of spirit forming pure nations in which our children can live under marble pillars, not suffer for old people, ugly people, BPD-laden women, countries who despise us. We need to learn to stick together for ourselves, for our future, not look backward to dead and sick nations. We are our people, nothing more, nothing less, not a flag or an economic zone. remember that. Wherever we settle is where our nation is, whether in old nations or new ones.

I believe what I have outlined in this piece will occur whether we like it or not, and many on the right, understandably, will not. Many young people, men and women alike, both left and right, are feeling profoundly disconnected from their nations as they are today. We will see people moving, leaving, especially in a world of stablecoin-backed overseas transfers, remote work, and Starlink. The question is whether or not those of us gifted with vision take advantage of this phenomenon to build something lasting, something worthwhile, as our ancestors did when presented with the same chance. Thus was the Anglosphere built, after all.

At the very least, and before anything else, consider doing things with people you know, online or otherwise. Get a job where someone you know works. Start a business together. Conquer a third-world nation and establish a minority-rule Apartheid state. Start a groupchat. I’m always heartened to see RW-owned publishing companies or other such things, they are the starting signs of a necessary shift towards building parallel societies, mutual-help. Another step might be creating RW-focused NGOs, orgs to help our people at home and overseas. We won’t get anywhere by expecting everything to be fixed just by sending people back where they belong. Our problems, our fight is much harder, much longer than just the next election, but it can be won, will be won, whatever that looks like. Just don’t assume it will look exactly how you expect. Victory flies whatever flag she chooses, and it may well be a new one.

Kalts

We duck and hide and watch
The gulls collide with the wind
Like kids in a surprise kiss
And just how fitting a scene this
So bleak yet serene this
For the archer who will miss

Shall we meet under new flags?

- Rome, New Flags